Case Study
More Information

Submitted: January 17, 2023 | Approved: February 13, 2023 | Published: February 14, 2023

How to cite this article: Qazi Z, Dawood HM. Knowledge of diabetic patients regarding diabetes management, diet, lifestyle modification and blood glucose monitoring. Arch Pharm Pharma Sci. 2023; 7: 001-003.

DOI: 10.29328/journal.apps.1001036

Copyright License: © 2023 Qazi Z, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 FullText PDF

Knowledge of diabetic patients regarding diabetes management, diet, lifestyle modification and blood glucose monitoring

Zarmeena Qazi1* and Hafiz Muhammad Dawood2

1Department of Pharmacy, National Excellence Institute, Islamabad, Pakistan
2Department of Community Medicine, The Sahara College Narowal, Punjab, Pakistan

*Address for Correspondence: Zarmeena Qazi, Department of Pharmacy, National Excellence Institute, Islamabad, Pakistan, Email: zarminaqazi@yahoo.com

Hyperglycemia due to abnormalities in insulin production, insulin action, or both characterizes the metabolic disorders known collectively as diabetes [1]. The many problems that may arise from unchecked diabetes make this disease potentially fatal. Uncontrolled diabetes may be attributed to a number of different things, including low literacy rates, a lack of patient knowledge, attitude, and beliefs; patient behavior in the management of diabetes; non-adherence to medicines; a lack of understanding about conventional treatment standards; a deficiency in diabetes-related education; one’s lifestyle; one’s family history; one’s refusal to limit one’s food; and the absence of a specialized person in the management of diabetes. There is a strong correlation between literacy and diabetes awareness [2]. Patients from lower socioeconomic statuses tend to have lower levels of health literacy, which is a significant obstacle in the treatment of chronic conditions like diabetes [3]. When a diabetic patient’s health is evaluated early on, serious issues are less likely to develop down the road. The first stage in the patient’s education is to help them come to terms with their diagnosis and actively engage in their care, which is essential in the successful management of diabetes. Second, make sure you cover all the bases when talking about diabetes, such as how to control your condition with food, exercise and other methods. Following up with patients on a regular basis, providing them with ongoing education, and giving them the tools they need to manage their own condition is the last stage [4].

Most people in Pakistan learn about diabetes and how to manage it through their doctors, relatives, and friends who have the disease or work in the medical field, the media (print, broadcast, and online), nurses, and other patients sitting in OPD waiting rooms [5]. Doctors’ explanations of diabetes care were judged to be insufficient in one research [6]. Educating children and adolescents about diabetes by a multidisciplinary team of nurses, endocrinologists, pediatricians and dietitians was associated with lower HbA1c values [7] in research from Karachi, Pakistan. Diabetic individuals might avoid major consequences by preparing themselves with the correct diabetes education before Ramadan [8].

Sample population

600 patients from the public and 600 patients from the private sector. Out of 1200 respondents, 51.83% (n = 622) were male while 48.17% (n = 578) were female Table 1.

Table 1: Sample population.
Gender Male 622 (51.83)
Female 578 (48.17)
Qualification Primary 178 (14.83)
Middle 136 (11.33)
Metric 146 (12.17)
Intermediate 92 (7.67)
Graduation 92 (7.67)
Professional degree 106 (8.83)
Illiterate 446 (37.1)
Knowledge and perceptions of patients regarding diabetes management

The correct range of fasting and random blood glucose level for normal and individuals with diabetes were not known by the patients from the public sector in 88.33% (n = 530), 77% (n = 462), 84% (n = 504) and 72% (n = 432) of the cases while in 92.66% (n = 556), 78.33% (n = 470), 83.66% (n = 502) and 75.33% (n = 452) of the cases it was not known by the patients from the private sector, respectively Table 2.

Table 2: Knowledge and perceptions of patients regarding diabetes management.
Indicators Pt. in Public Sector Pt. in Private Sector
  Correct Incorrect Correct Incorrect
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Normal
Fasting blood glucose level is 70-100 mg/dl 70 (11.66) 530 (88.33) 44 (7.33) 556 (92.66)
Random blood glucose level is < 160 mg/dl 138 (23) 462 (77) D FS 130 (21.66) 470 (78.33)
Pre-Diabetes
Fasting blood glucose level is 110-125 mg/dl 42 (7) 558 (93) 82 (13.66) 518 (86.33)
Random blood glucose level is 120-160 mg/dl 24 (4) 576 (96) 40 (6.66) 560 (93.33)
Diabetes
Fasting blood glucose level is > 126 mg/dl 96 (16) 504 (84) 98 (16.33) 502 (83.66)
Random blood glucose level is > 250 mg/dl 168 (28) 432 (72) 148 (24.66) 452 (75.33)
Gestational Diabetes
Fasting blood glucose level is ≥ 92 mg/dl 4 (0.66) 596 (99.3) 8 (1.33) 592 (98.66)
Random blood glucose level is ≥ 150 mg/dl 4 (0.66) 596 (99.3) 8 (1.33) 592 (98.66)
Knowledge of prescribers and patients regarding diet, lifestyle modification, and blood glucose monitoring

The correct range of blood glucose level before a meal, blood glucose level after 2hr of meals, blood glucose level at bedtime, carbohydrates, proteins, and fats percentage in diet were known by patients from the public sector in 75% (n = 450), 62.33% (n = 374), 88.33% (n = 530), 55% (n = 330), 48% (n = 288) and 30.33% (n = 182) of the cases while in 64% (n = 384), 61% (n = 366), 89% (n = 534), 52.33% (n = 314), 51% (n = 306) and 35% (n = 210) of the cases in which patients were from the private sector, respectively Table 3.

Table 3: Knowledge of prescribers and patients regarding diet, lifestyle modification and blood glucose monitoring.
Indicators Pt. in Public Sector Pt. in Private Sector
  Correct Incorrect Correct Incorrect
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Blood glucose before a meal should be 90 mg/dl - 100 mg/dl 150 (25) 450 (75) 216 (36) 384 (64)
Blood glucose 2 hr. after a meal should be equal to 200 mg/dl 226 (37.66) 374 (62.33) 234 (39) 366 (61)
Blood glucose at bedtime should be < 90 mg/dl 70 (11.66) 530 (88.33) 66 (11) 534 (89)
Blood glucose at 3-4 am should be equal to 140 mg/dl 14 (2.33) 586 (97.66) 28 (4.66) 572 (95.33)
Blood glucose before exercise should be 140 mg/dl 6 (1) 594 (99) 28 (4.66) 572 (95.33)
HbA1c should be 6.5% - 7% 56 (9.33) 544 (90.66) 158 (26.33) 442 (73.66)
Blood pressure should be 130/80 mmHg 228 (38) 372 (62) 206 (34.33) 394 (65.66)
Carbohydrates percentage > 50% - 60% increases BG level 270 (45) 330 (55) 286 (47.66) 314 (52.33)
Protein percentage > 15% - 20% increases BG level 312 (52) 288 (48) 294 (49) 306 (51)
Fats (lipids) percentage > 20% - 30% increases BG level 418 (69.66) 182 (30.33) 390 (65) 210 (35)
Smoking increases blood glucose level 86 (14.33) 514 (85.66) 118 (19.66) 482 (80.33)
Alcohol affects blood glucose level 46 (7.66) 554 (92.33) 52 (8.66) 548 (91.33)
Mean scores of knowledge of patients and prescribers regarding the management of type 2 diabetes

The mean composite knowledge score regarding the management of type 2 diabetes was: patients from the public sector (36.03 ± 3.75) and from the private sector (36.02 ± 385). A detailed description is given below Table 4.

Table 4: Mean scores of knowledge of patients and prescribers regarding the management of type 2 diabetes.
Variables Correct range of blood glucose levels (8-16) Mean (± S.D) Diabetes management (12-24) Mean (± S.D) Composite (20-40) Mean (± S.D)
Gender Male = 15.08 (± 1.37) Female = 15.23 (± 1.25) Male = 20.55 (± 2.81) Female = 21.22 (± 2.63) Male = 35.63 (± 3.74) Female = 36.46 (± 3.62)
Qualification Primary = 15.57 (± 1.039) Middle = 14.68 (± 1.121) Metric = 14.87 (± 1.417) Intermediate = 14.96 (± 1.26) Graduate = 13.85 (± 1.63) Professional degree = 13.71 (± 1.82) No Education = 15.77 (± 0.70) Primary = 21.38 (± 2.18) Middle = 20.00 (± 2.45) Metric = 19.70 (± 2.30) Intermediate = 18.85 (± 2.56) Graduate = 18.40 (± 2.01) Professional degree = 17.38 (± 2.54) No Education = 22.90 (± 1.38) Primary = 36.95 (± 2.88) Middle = 34.67 (± 3.08) Metric = 34.57 (± 3.21) Intermediate = 33.82 (± 3.36) Graduate = 32.25 (± 2.95) Professional degree = 31.09 (± 3.84) No Education = 38.68 (± 1.79)
Duration of Diabetes < 1 year = 15.16 (± 1.35) 1-5 years = 15.09 (± 1.13) < 1 year = 20.99 (± 2.76) 1-5 years = 20.12 (± 2.58) < 1 year = 36.16 (± 3.73) 1-5 years = 35.21 (± 3.47)
Sector Public = 15.15 (± 1.19) Private = 15.15 (± 1.43) Public = 20.87 (± 2.73) Private = 20.86 (± 2.78) Public = 36.03 (± 3.57) Private = 36.02 (± 3.85)
Result and conclusion

Patient education on the significance of dietary and lifestyle changes was found to be lacking in the present investigation. Possible causes include diabetes educators’ and patients’ lack of motivation, the patient’s inability to follow through on their own learning, and the diabetes educators’ use of ineffective counseling strategies. Despite the success of diabetes education, a number of studies have pointed to patients’ lack of understanding or poor performance with regard to their treatment plan, complications prevention and control, food, and the management of gestational diabetes [9-12]. Another study’s findings emphasized the importance of healthcare professionals’ and patients access to diabetes education in the fight against the epidemic of diabetes-related complications [13].

The multidisciplinary health team in Pakistan has significant difficulty in developing and implementing effective diabetes education activities. Educators for people with diabetes lack proper training. Pakistan’s diabetes education program lacks central oversight from planners and evaluators. It’s important to remember, however, that this initiative is still relatively new in Pakistan, so it stands to reason that there would be teething issues with patient education. Therefore, the chance to overcome numerous gaps in patient education may be found in attentive supervision, as well as frequent and continuing training programs for prescribers.

References
  1. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S62-9. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S062. Erratum in: Diabetes Care. 2010 Apr;33(4):e57. PMID: 20042775; PMCID: PMC2797383.
  2. Al Sayah F, Majumdar SR, Williams B, Robertson S, Johnson JA. Health literacy and health outcomes in diabetes: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Mar;28(3):444-52. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2241-z. Epub 2012 Oct 13. PMID: 23065575; PMCID: PMC3579965.
  3. Schillinger D, Grumbach K, Piette J, Wang F, Osmond D, Daher C, Palacios J, Sullivan GD, Bindman AB. Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA. 2002 Jul 24-31;288(4):475-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.4.475. PMID: 12132978.
  4. Meece JD, Campbell RK. Insulin lispro update. Diabetes Educ. 2002 Mar-Apr;28(2):269-77. doi: 10.1177/014572170202800212. PMID: 11924304.
  5. Rafique G, Shaikh F. Identifying needs and barriers to diabetes education in patients with diabetes. J Pak Med Assoc. 2006 Aug;56(8):347-52. PMID: 16967784.
  6. Shahpurwala M, Sani N, Shah S, Shuja F, Shahid K, Tariq H, Huda Z, Zuberi L, Jafar T, Jafar TH. General medical practitioners in Pakistan fail to educate patients adequately about complications of diabetes: A major cause of concern for a developing country. Pract Diabetes. 2006; 23: 57-61.
  7. Qayyum AA, Lone SW, Ibrahim MN, Atta I, Raza J. Effects of diabetes self-management education on glycaemic control in children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010 Dec;20(12):802-5. PMID: 21205545.
  8. Ahmedani MY, Haque MS, Basit A, Fawwad A, Alvi SF. Ramadan Prospective Diabetes Study: the role of drug dosage and timing alteration, active glucose monitoring and patient education. Diabet Med. 2012 Jun;29(6):709-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03563.x. PMID: 22587405.
  9. Falahaty J, Rezaee R, Astaneh S, Mousavi FM. The awareness of diabetic patients with different levels of retinopathy of eye complications associated with diabetes. AMUJ.2010; 13.
  10. Golchin M, Ghorbani A. Knowledge and practice on insulin self-injection procedure in diabetic patients at Qazvin diabetes unit. J Inflamm. 2008; 12; 89-90.
  11. Shamsi M, Sharifi Rad G, Kachoei A, Hasan Zadeh A, Dejham S. Knowledge, attitude and practice of women by type2 diabetes about walking. Payesh Health Mon. 2011; 10: 477-484.
  12. Uddin I, Iftikhar R, Ahmed T. Knowledge, Attitude and practice of diabetic patients before and after education intervention. DIabet Int. 2001; 11: 80-82.
  13. Zwarenstein M, Reeves S, Barr H, Hammick M, Koppel I, Atkins J. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. CDSR 2000.